DOJ didn't sell Bitcoin forfeited from Samourai case: White House advisor

1/17/2026, 12:05:47 AM
LyanBy Lyan
DOJ didn't sell Bitcoin forfeited from Samourai case: White House advisor

DOJ Didn't Sell Bitcoin Forfeited from Samourai Case: White House Advisor

Recent reports indicate that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) did not liquidate Bitcoin seized in connection with the Samourai Wallet case. This detail, confirmed by a White House advisor, sheds light on the government's handling of forfeited cryptocurrency assets and adherence to existing executive orders.

The core reason cited for not selling the Bitcoin is President Donald Trump's Executive Order 14233. This order stipulates that any Bitcoin obtained through criminal or civil forfeiture proceedings "shall not be sold." This directive introduces a layer of complexity to the government's approach to managing seized crypto assets and could set a precedent for future cases.

Expert View

The decision to hold, rather than sell, forfeited Bitcoin raises several interesting points. Firstly, it suggests a possible long-term strategic view on Bitcoin, perhaps acknowledging its potential for future value appreciation. While the Executive Order is presented as the primary driver, other factors may be at play. For example, there might be concerns about the market impact of large-scale Bitcoin sales by government entities.

The executive order itself is noteworthy. It reveals a political perspective on digital assets that warrants further scrutiny. The motivations behind preventing the sale of seized Bitcoin could range from a desire to avoid market manipulation to a belief that the assets should be held as a strategic reserve. Regardless of the rationale, this decision underscores the growing importance of cryptocurrency within the sphere of government policy.

What To Watch

Several key aspects warrant continued observation. Firstly, it is crucial to monitor how the DOJ handles future seizures of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. Will Executive Order 14233 remain in effect, and will it be consistently applied? Any deviations from this policy could signal a shift in the government's approach.

Secondly, the long-term implications of holding large amounts of Bitcoin are uncertain. Will the government develop a clear strategy for managing these assets, including security protocols and auditing procedures? Public transparency regarding these holdings is vital to maintain trust and prevent potential abuse.

Finally, we should watch for any legislative efforts to codify or overturn Executive Order 14233. A formal law would provide greater clarity and stability compared to an executive order, which can be easily reversed by a subsequent administration.

Source: Cointelegraph